ࡱ> ?A> @ 0bjbjPP "0:: NNNNNNNbjjjj$DbB       $R0Nzzz0NNEz NN z NN Pʍj 6[0 R bbNNNN NLZ@S400bb& D bb& E 10 Introduction to Engineering Presentation Evaluation Form Team: Names: Date: CriteriaRatingTitle Slide 3: Title is descriptive and specific; entity for which presentation is being made is clearly given; names of team members listed; date of presentation given. 2: Title is adequate but may be lacking in specificity, missing one of the required elements or mistake in: entity for which presentation is being made, names of team members, date of presentation. 1: Title is adequate, but missing two of the required elements or several of them are not clearly stated.Introduction to Presentation and Project 3: Goals of project are clearly stated and purpose/scope of presentation is clear 2: Goals of project are not clearly stated or purpose/scope of presentation is not clear. 1: Project goals or presentation introduction missingDesign of Turbine Blade x 2 5: Design and rationale for design choices are very clearly presented and demonstrate that research was done and/or engineering judgment was applied to come up with the design. 4: Design and rationale for design choices are somewhat clearly presented and some thought/engineering judgment was applied to come up with the design. 3: Design and rationale for design choices lack clarity. Rationale is barely adequate. 2: Design and rationale are not clear. Rationale is shallow to inadequate. 1: Design and rationale are not clear. Rationale is inadequate.Design of Support Tower x 2 5: Design and rationale for design choices are very clearly presented and demonstrate that research was done and/or engineering judgment was applied to come up with the design. 4: Design and rationale for design choices are somewhat clearly presented and some thought/engineering judgment was applied to come up with the design. 3: Design or rationale for design choices lack clarity. Rationale is barely adequate. 2: Design or rationale is not clear. Rationale is shallow to inadequate. 1: Design and rationale are not clear. Rationale is inadequate.Performance of Wind Turbine and Support Tower x 2 5: Clear and complete summary of performance results; all elements present: height, weight, power generated, and stiffness; graphs of data are properly used, units are given and are correct 4: All performance elements are included, but their presentation shows some inattention to detail (e.g., units missing on graphs, typos, etc.) 3: Missing a performance element and/or their presentation shows more significant inattention to detail 2: Missing several performance elements and/or sloppy presentation of results 1: Missing most performance elements and/or inadequate presentation of resultsConclusions and Recommendations for Further Work 5: Clear and complete conclusions and recommendations for further work; demonstrates that some thought was given as to what worked well and/or did not work well 4: Clear conclusions, but recommendations for further work lack some specificity and/or substance 3: Conclusions less than clear, recommendations for further work may lack some specificity and/or substance 2: Conclusions or recommendations missing or poorly done. 1: Inadequate or missing conclusions and/or recommendations for further work.TotalComments:  !">@DUefrst}      > ? @ B k l m n õõõ}m_Rh\"kh\CJOJQJh`Oh\5CJOJQJh\h\>*CJOJQJaJh\h\"kCJOJQJh`OCJOJQJhCJOJQJh\"kCJOJQJh\"kh\"kCJOJQJh`Oh\"k5CJOJQJh\5CJOJQJh\h\"k>*CJOJQJaJ h\"k5\h$bh$b56CJh$b h$bh$bh\"k ?@U^efr))b$_U P<$Ifskd$$Ifl0Z%"):%0(64 la $$Ifa$  !")xgd\"k &dPgd$br @ A B k ]P?(<$If^gd\ P<$Ifgd*Eskd$$Ifl0Z%"):%0(64 la $P<$Ifa$(<$If^gd\(<$If^gdRn   O P R i m n p q r   ! " y z    X Y ͽxnxnxnxdnnxdxdnnxdxnndnhCJOJQJhgCJOJQJhRCJOJQJh\"khgCJOJQJh`Ohg5CJOJQJh\h\"k>*CJOJQJaJh\h*E>*CJOJQJaJh\hg>*CJOJQJaJh\hh\>*OJQJh\5CJOJQJh`Oh\5CJOJQJh\CJOJQJ&  P Q R n  aTCCb$:(<$If^gdR P<$Ifgd*EskdB$$Ifl0Z%"):%0(64 la $P<$Ifa$ P<$Ifgd\(<$If^gd\  Y hVb$:b$:b$:naPPb$:Pb$:(<$If^gd$b P<$Ifgd$bskd$$Ifl0Z%"):%0(64 la $P<$Ifa$(<$If^gdR Y [ \ hjVX_`bcehϿϿuuuuh4MCJOJQJh$b5CJOJQJh$bCJOJQJh\"kh$bCJOJQJh`Oh$b5CJOJQJh\h*E>*CJOJQJaJh\h$b>*CJOJQJaJh\"khRhRCJOJQJhCJOJQJhRCJOJQJhR5CJOJQJ*V`b$:b$:]P??(($If^gd\ P<$Ifgd$bskdv$$Ifl0Z%"):%0(64 la $P<$Ifa$P<$If^gd$b(<$If^gd$b`fgh:]S P<$Ifskd$$Ifl0Z%"):%0(64 la $P<$Ifa$P($If^gd\(($If^gd\ h9:<=  ABDEĺѺѺѺ h\"k5\h}8h\"kh]h]5CJOJQJh}8CJOJQJh]CJOJQJh\"kh]CJOJQJh`Oh]5CJOJQJh\h}8>*CJOJQJaJh\h\"k>*CJOJQJaJB]Wb$$Ifskd$$Ifl0Z%"):%0(64 la $P<$Ifa$P($If^gd\(($If^gd\xgd}8skdD$$Ifl0Z%"):%        0(64 la 1h/ =!`"`#@$%$$If!vh5:%5#v:%#v:V l0(65:%5/  4a$$If!vh5:%5#v:%#v:V l0(65:%54a$$If!vh5:%5#v:%#v:V l0(65:%54a$$If!vh5:%5#v:%#v:V l0(65:%54a$$If!vh5:%5#v:%#v:V l0(65:%54a$$If!vh5:%5#v:%#v:V l0(65:%54a$$If!vh5:%5#v:%#v:V l0(65:%54a$$If!vh5:%5#v:%#v:V l0(65:%5/  4a@@@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH :@: Heading 1$@&5\H@H Heading 2$$P<@&a$5\J@J Heading 3$@&5CJOJQJ\^JL@L Heading 4$$@&a$6OJQJ]^JDA@D Default Paragraph FontVi@V  Table Normal :V 44 la (k@(No List 0?@U^efr@ABkPQRnYhV`  f g h :  B (080x00 0 0 @0@0@0@0 @0 @0 0000 0 0 000000 0 0 0p0p0p0p0p0p 0p 0t 0p@0p@0p@0p@0p0p 0p 0t 0p0p0p0p0p0p 0p 0t 0 0 0 0efr@ABnYhV`  f g h :  B @00@0@00@0@00@00@0 @0@00@0@0@00@00@00@00@00`@0@0@0@00@00@00@00@004@0@0@0@00@00@00@00@00h@0@00@0@00@00@00@0#0 @0#0/@0@00n Y h r V`  8@0(  B S  ?=)\l$I T ,)X$   9*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttagsplace=*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceName=*urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags PlaceType   @qf h    R}8:4M`Og\"k*E\]$bV/U^ef@ABPQRf g h @ Hnn @{ P@UnknownGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z ArialUTimesNewRomanPS-BoldMT5& zaTahoma"h}&}&J&  r4d  3QH(?:ME 120 Presentation Evaluation+ME 120, experimentatl methods, presentation BJ FurmanThalia AnagnosOh+'0(8 P\ x    ME 120 Presentation Evaluation BJ Furman,ME 120, experimentatl methods, presentationNormalThalia Anagnos3Microsoft Word 10.0@0@6,@@׷ ՜.+,0  hp  91ý  ME 120 Presentation Evaluation Title  "#$%&'()*+,-/012345789:;<=@Root Entry F ݠBData 1Table! WordDocument"0SummaryInformation(.DocumentSummaryInformation86CompObjj  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q